In re AS&D Enterprise LLP (GST AAR Haryana) AAR Haryana held that that Security services provided by LLP to any registered person are not covered by Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) and are taxable on forward charge basis.
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the denial of availment of Cenvat Credit on performa invoices was absolutely wrong.
The Karnataka High Court has held that there is no conflict between the power to levy GST under Goods and Service Tax and the power of the Municipal Corporation to levy advertisement tax
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Manmohan and Justice Subramonium Prasad has held that the taxpayer could not file a response under the Faceless Scheme due to a technical glitch in the e-filing portal.
ITAT said that the assessee is doing non-delivery-based transactions and in such case the turnover has to be determined on the basis of the net of sales and purchase of shares
ITAT has held that the expenditure incurred by the assessee as such on the replacement of wooden body of trucks has to be allowed fully against the income of the assessee in the current year.
Baalu Renukadevi Vs. Union of India, the publication of the list of disqualified directors by the ROC and the deactivation of the DIN of the Appellants is hereby quashed
.jpg "GST on Goods Transport Agency (GTA)")
