|GSTR-7 (August 2021)||10-Sep-2021|
|GSTR-8 (August 2021)||10-Sep-2021|
|GSTR-1 (August 2021)||11-Sep-2021|
|IFF (opted for quarterly filing as per QRMP scheme) (August 2021)||13-Sep-2021|
|GSTR-6 (August 2021)||13-Sep-2021|
|Due date for issue of TDS Certificate for tax deducted u/s 194-IA/194-IB/194M in July 2021||14-Sep-2021|
|Second installment of advance tax for the AY 2022-23||15-Sep-2021|
|Due date for furnishing of Form 24G by an office of the Government where TDS/TCS for the month of August 2021 has been paid without the production of a challan||15-Sep-2021|
|Due date for furnishing statement in Form no. 3BB by a stock exchange in respect of transactions in which client codes been modified after registering in the system for the month of August 2021||15-Sep-2021|
GST AAR Maharashtra ruled that crumb rubber/granules are classifiable under Heading 4004 and is liable to GST @18%.
Orissa High Court issued a direction to the CBIC to either open the portal and permit the Petitioner to file the TRAN-1 form electronically on or before 1st November 2021
In North End Food Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of U P, The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the order passed by GST Revisional authority. Read order
In OPC Assets Solutions Pvt Ltd Vs State of Tripura, the High Court of Tripura set aside the order passed by the Superintendent of Taxes
The Patiala House Court refused to grant bail to the accused of allegedly procuring bogus bills in order to wrongfully take credit of input tax.
The Maharashtra Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that no Goods and Services Tax (GST) will be payable on Hostel Rent of less than Rs 1000 per day per Student
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi ordered that the deposit of an employee's contribution to the provident fund and ESI beyond the due date will not be entitled to a deduction.
The division bench is headed by Chief Justice Dr. S. Muralidhar and Justice B.P. Routray listed the matter on 23rd September 2021 and issued the notice to the Income Tax Officer.
The Court ordered that the respondents are restrained from continuing with the reassessment proceedings, in any manner, pursuant to the impugned notices
ITAT Bangalore set aside the order passed by Ld CIT(A) in AY 2013-14 and direct the AO to delete the addition of Rs 32,03,288/- made by him u/s 14A of the Act.
In Vishwatej Developers Private Limited Vs ACIT, the Madras High Court said that merely because statutory approvals have been obtained by the assessee, viz., FIPB and RBI will not sanctify the transaction
SC directs Government to fill up vacancies of NCLAT and NCLT within two months
Baalu Renukadevi Vs. Union of India, the publication of the list of disqualified directors by the ROC and the deactivation of the DIN of the Appellants is hereby quashed
Stay updated with the latest tax news